A man who slipped on a grape outside Marks an Spence store has failed in his attempt to sue for damages. Mr Alexander Mark-Sklan was suing Marks and Spencer for £300,000 in damages after the incident which occurred in 2004.
He stated after the fall which resulted in ligament damage to his knee, he had found a grape on the underside of his shoe. He indicated that he had also suffered ‘adverse psychological effects and depression’ arising from the injury.
Whilst expressing sympathy for the claimant Deputy Judge John Leighton Williams QC said: "I am afraid I am unable to find for him on the evidence." He said: "In my judgment it is one of those accidents that could happen to any one of us."
Mr Martin-Sklan was representing himself has to pay around £15,000 towards Marks and Spencer's costs and given 28 days to pay an interim sum of £7,500.
Surely this is a victory for common sense.
Mean while: An elderly couple say they are distressed as an ambulance worker wants to sue them after falling during a call to their Lincolnshire home. The technician fell over on 82-year-old Joan Boardman's driveway in Louth as he went to fetch a stretcher.
The Boardmans have now received a letter from his solicitors saying he is seeking damages for personal injury. East Midlands Ambulance Service said the employee is pursuing the matter in his own right.
Let’s hope the Judge in this case, also has common sense, while I can understand the distress any injury can cause, I think in this case it is morally wrong to sue, accidents do happen, the injured paramedic should be able to recover costs from his employers insurance.
Rabbit
